|
|
Sep 10, 2008
|
SENATOR "SWEETIE" BARACK OBAMA REALIZED HE NEEDED SOMETHING MORE THAN "FAILED COMMUNITY ORGANIZER" TO OFFER SINCE AMERICA ISN'T IMPRESSED WITH HIS LACK OF EXPERIENCE. SO HE'S GOING TO BE EMPHASIZING HIS 'EDUCATION BACKGROUND.'
THAT WOULD BE THE WORK HE AND BILL AYERS DID.
THAT WOULD BE THE BILL AYERS HE PLANS NOT TO KNOW.
NOW HOW DO YOU SUPPOSE HE KNEW THAT? HOW DO YOU SUPPOSE HE HAD THAT READY UNLESS HE KNEW BILL AYERS WAS A HUGE ISSUE DESPITE ALL OF HIS LIES TO THE CONTRARY.
Turning to the US presidential race. Independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader can announce that the plan for the Nader-Gonzalez ticket to be on the ballot in 45 states by September 20th happened nine days early. Ralph and his running mate Matt Gonzalez (and their team of supporters) have already advanced the independent run further than in 2004 and have had to jump through obstacles of ballot access that no one should have to.
Choosing between the Republican and Democratic candidate would mean choosing the lesser of two evils. Instead, I prefer to align myself with a candidate who shares my views on stabilizing the economy, preventing war, and downsizing the government. This candidate is Ralph Nader.
Nader is the only presidential candidate who has experience running his own business. He has applicable knowledge of the economy and strives to distribute wealth equally. He was quoted on "Meet The Press" as saying: "There is a two-tier economy where the top 10 percent is doing quite well, the top one percent spectacularly. But the top one percent of the richest people in this country have financial wealth equal to the combined 95 percent of the American people. That's a very unhealthy inequality." In order to fix this, Nader proposes to repeal the Bush administration tax cuts and adjust the federal income tax. This shows that he is driven to help the average American survive the current economic slump. Nader also wants to help America move past Congress's war-happy regime. He proposes a "draft from the top," meaning when an administration approves a war, the service-aged children of all members of that Congress and Cabinet will be the first to serve. This would ensure that elected officials think carefully before declaring war. Nader also supports pulling out of Iraq within six months and trying to negotiate with Iran. He wants to take our men and women in uniform out of Iraq and bring them home where they belong.
Why?
We're celebrating.
At the beginning of this campaign, we made a promise:
Nader/Gonzalez on the ballot in 45 states by September 20.
Today -- Tuesday, September 9, 2008 -- eleven days ahead of schedule -- we declare victory.
We have completed our ballot access efforts and we're set to be on in 45 states. On in more states than in 2000 (43).
On in more states than in 2004 (34).
On in 45 states.
Now, the American people will have a choice.
To vote for a campaign free from corporate influence.
But, as you probably have figured out by now, we are not a campaign that rests on its laurels.
So, today we are proud to announce the launch of our eight-week Nader/Gonzalez Get Out the Vote drive.
We need to raise $80,000 by September 17.
This money will be used to reach out to Americans throughout this country.
We're planning on deploying 30 full-time field staff.
Ordering tens of thousands of lawn signs.
Printing hundreds of thousands of pamphlets.
And making hundreds of thousands of phone calls.
To inform the American people that they now have a choice in November.
And to get them to vote for Nader/Gonzalez.
Want health care for all? Vote Nader/Gonzalez.
Need a living wage? Vote Nader/Gonzalez.
Want to transform the country to a solar energy economy? Vote Nader/Gonzalez.
Want to reverse course in the Middle East? Vote Nader/Gonzalez.
Help us celebrate this historic opportunity the only way we know how.
With action for a change.
So, donate $11 now to the Nader/Gonzalez Get Out the Vote Fund.
(If you give $100 or more now, we will send to you In Pursuit of Justice, the 520-page book of essays by Ralph Nader -- essays on corporate power, the Constitution, and transforming our country. If you donate $100 now, we will send you this historic collection -- autographed by the man himself -- Ralph Nader. (This offer ends at 11:59 p.m. September 17, 2008))
So, let's start to spread the word.
Nader/Gonzalez on in 45 states.
Time to crank it up.
And get out the vote.
Let's get it done. Onward to November.
|
Posted at 04:25 pm by cedricsbigmix
Permalink
"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills)
Tuesday,
September 9, 2008. Chaos and violence continue, Bully Boy lies about
the illegal war (again), the puppet 'government' continues their tag
sale on Iraqi resources, Kuwait is all over the map, Iraq's Parliament
resumes sessions, Ralph Nader has big news, and more. Today
Bully Boy spoke at Eisenhower Hall at the National Defense University.
He hailed the 'handover' of Al Anbar Province as a "remarkable event,"
referred to the followers of Moqtada al-Sadr as "Shia extremist groups"
and more blah blah before he got to the only reason anyone was paying
attention to him: drawdowns. "By November," he declared, "we'll bring
home a marine battalion that is now serving in Anbar Province. And in
Feburary of 2009, another army combat brigade will come come home.
This amounts to about 8,000 additional American troops returning home
without replacement." Reality, Bully Boy leaves the White House in
January. Anything done prior to that he is over, anything after that,
he can't promise. So today's announcement went beyond what many were
expection in that he's promising a marien battalion will be brought
back in November without a replacement sent back in. And that's the
only thing he announced regarding Iraq. Thom Shanker (New York Times) reported
before the speech and didn't grasp that Bully Boy cannot make any
promises regarding what the incoming president will do. Not only does
Bully Boy not have that power, considering stop-loss and tour
extensions, reporters should be a little less quick to repeat hollow
'announcements' when it is the service members and their families that
are harmed when 'announcements' don't come to pass. Dan Eggen (Washington Post) demonstrated
how you report 'announcements' of events that would take place after a
new president was sworn in: "President Bush will announce today that
the number of U.S. combat brigades in Iraq will remain steady until
after he leaves office, deferring any further decisions about troop
withdrawals to his successor, according to a copy of his speech
released by the White House." That is what Bully Boy did, he left it
in the hands of the next president. The illegal war he started over
five years ago is one he will leave office without ending and without
any major reductions in the number of US troops stationed in Iraq. The point is not lost on all. CQ Politics reports,
"Missouri Democrat Ike Skelton, chairman of the House Armed Services
commitee, said the president's action merely defers decisions until the
next administration." The point is lost on Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid who is quoted foaming at the mouth, "Given the increasingly
violent situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan, I am stunned that
President Bush has decided to bring so few troops home from Iraq and
send so few resources to Afghanistan." 146,000 US service members are
stationed in Iraq and Harry Reid's big concern is not ending the
illegal war it's getting them out of Iraq . . . to ship them off to
Aghanistan. Let's drop back to the 90s, via Caroline Frost (the BBC), to remember what War Hawk Democrats (Reid is one) really think: " UN
ambassador Madeleine Albright asked him, 'What's the point of having
this superb military you're always talking about if we can't use it?' For
General Colin Powell, this most military of politicians who has watched
men die, the answer was, and remains, simple. 'American GIs are not toy
soldiers to be moved around on some global game board'." Someone needs
to tell that to Harry Reid -- not Powell, of course, he destroyed his
name long ago. At the White House today, Dana Perino had laughs at
Harry's expense with remarks during a press briefing which included:
"Look, I don't know who briefs Senator Reid and I don't know what sort
of staff work he gets or the updates he gets. . . . Well, you know,
when Senator Reid becomes Commander-in-Chief he'll have a little bit
more credibility on that score." Also during the briefing, Perino was
asked why Bully Boy didn't announce a large draw-down and she pushed US
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, Admiral Mike Mullen and Gen David
Petraeus' recommendations before declaring, "So I can't say why he
didn't choose something else. But he accepted their recommendation."
Asked why the number of the draw-down wasn't larger after the White
House has repeatedly sold the 'success' in Iraq (and Bully Boy sold it
in his speech today) which resulted in a jumbled response by Perino:
"Well one thing President Bush has said, and he asked his commanders,
is how do we make sure that the gains that we have made in security are
cemented enough so that when we do pull back, it won't be -- it won't
mean that terrorists come back and fill that space. So President Bush
thinks that taking 8,000 troops out is the recommendation from the
Pentagon, and the one that is prudent right now. And Secretary -- I'm
sorry, General Petraeus believes that further reductions are possible
in the first half of 2009, but it's going to have to depend on
conditions on the ground. And so we'll continue to look at it. I think
that either way, the President -- people would question -- should he
send more/should he send less? He thinks that he hit it just right,
that the Pentagon's recommendation was about the right size." What she
eventually gets out are the talking points the White House repeats over
and over. The news is in the stumble it took for her to arrive at them. Like Thom Shanker, CBS News fails to grasp
that the Bully Boy has no control over the next presidency so his
'promises' for 2009 are meaningless. They do point out that prior to
the escalation (the so-called 'surge'), the US had 136,000 service
members stationed in Iraq. Ther are approximately 146,000 stationed in
Iraq today. Not only does what Bully Boy can promise not bring the
number down to pre-'surge' levels, even including what he 'promises'
someone else will do does not bring it down to pre-'surge' levels. AFP notes,
"The decision means the president's successor will take office in
January with the US military presence in Iraq at about 140,000 troops
-- still a bigger deployment than two years ago despite the deep
unpopularity of the war." US Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi bungles it with her statements
almost as badly as Reid does, "After five and a half years of war,
President Bush will leave office with nearly as many U.S. troops in
Iraq as were there before the 'surge' began in January 2007. The
continued heavy commitment of U.S. forces is hampering our ability to
fight the real war against terrorism in Afghanistan, is hurting our
military readiness, and is extending the strain of long deployments on
our military families. The President is incapable of finding a way to
make our troops the beneficiaries of whatever improvements there have
been in security in Iraq." Pelosi, facing a serious challenge in the
November election from Cindy Sheehan,
had no reason to toss in Afghanistan. Strip that out and her only word
problem is minor (there will be more US forces in Iraq than prior to
the 'surge'). The larger problem -- that she herself has done little
(though Pelosi blames that on the US Senate) -- may make her statements
hard for many to believe in but when she starts playing the idiot on
Afghanistan, she's begging the eighth district to send Cindy to
Congress. And let's drive this point home
because not only can Bully Boy not make promises for the next
president, the situation changes all the time and the ones hurt are the
service members and their families. For those with short (or
non-existant) memories in the press corps, August 2006, AP reported:
"About 300 Alaska-based soldiers sent home from Iraq just before their
unit's deployment was extended last month must now bo back, the Army
said Monday, setting up a wrenching departure for troops and families
who thought their service there was finished." So instead of propping
up a lame-duck on his way out, the press should be very careful about
how they 'report' announcements. Bully Boy can turn around tomorrow
and decided that the November return (the only one in his speech he has
any control over) won't happen. The same urge to treat every stammer
out of his mouth as gospel was present in the lead-up to the illegal
war. Wasn't the press have supposed to learned from that? For those
still confused, follow the example of Demetri Sevastopulo (Financial Times of London):
"George W. Bush plans to withdraw 4,000 troops from Iraq before the end
of his presidency as the Pentagon starts to shift its focus to
Afghanistan, the White House said yesterday." While
on the topic of service members, yesterday the US Defense Dept
announced a new service, Wounded Warrior Resource Center for service
members and their families who "have concerns or other difficulties
during their recovery process" and the WWRC can be contacted via e-mail
at wwrc@militaryresource.com or by phone at (800) 342-9647. Turning
to the topic of fleecing, the US installed puppet government continues
signing deals on behalf of the occupied country of Iraq. Nicholas Spangler and Hussein Kadhim (McClatchy Newspapers) report an agreement was reached "with Royal Dutch Shell to exploit the immense amount of natural gas in souther Iraq". AFP notes
the deal is to be finalized in October and "Royal Dutch Shell will form
a gas venture with energy-rich Iraq worth up to four billion dollars,
the oil ministry said Tuesday of the first Western oil major to do a
deal with the central government since the 2003 invasion." Yesterday
the Jerusalem Post noted,
"The United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Bahrain and Kuwait are sending
ambassadors to Iraq, and other countries are considering following
suit." Waleed Ibrahim (Reuters) reports
today that Abdullah Ibrahim al-Shehhi, UAE's Ambassador to Iraq,
arrived in Baghdad today and was welcomed by Iraq's Sunni
vice-president Tareq al-Hashemi who stated, "It is a message to all
states which are still hesitant to open their diplomatic missions in
Iraq. This new, heavy diplomatic presence in Iraq is proof that Iraq
has started to recover from the last five years of crisis." But let's
not pretend it was all about the diplomacy and not about the coin. Azzaman explains,
"Foreign investors from Germany, the United Arab Emirates and Iraq are
offering to set up oil refineries in southern Iraq." And the renewal
of diplomatic ties also comes as UPI reports,
"Officials in the United Arab Emirates are examing a proposal to build
a $200 billion, 112-mile canal to transport oil around the volatile
Strait of Hormuz." Staying with the topic of coin, Erica Goode and Muhafer al-Husaini (New York Times) note
the Sunni thugs who stopped attacking the US and Iraqis when the US put
them on the payroll ("Awakening" Council) heard Brig Gen Tarek Abdul
Hameed declare that the puppet government in Baghdad would indeed pick
up their payrolls. Meanwhile on the legislative front, Iraq's Parliament is back in session after their summer recess. Robert H. Reid (AP) observes,
"Tuesday's session was held in the Baghdad Convention Center inside the
U.S.-protected Green Zone, despite an announcement last June that the
assembly would meet in the former National Assembly building outside
the zone." Mohammed Abbas and Waleed Ibrahim (Reuters) report
Mahmoud al-Mashhadani, Speaker of Parliament, is calling a meeting of
"the heads of political parties" tomorrow to address the stalled
provincial elections. Meanwhile Sunday Nicholas Spangler (McClatchy Newspapers) reported
that Iraq sent their finance minister to Kuwait today re: Iraq's
invasion of Kuwait in 1991 in order to discuss "payment of debts and
compensation" for that action. The visit was put on hold. CNN reports
Sheikh Nasser al-Mohammed al-Ahmed al-Sabah, Prime Minister of Kuwait,
will visited Baghdad "soon". Well that is interesting . . . as is [PDF
format warning] this: " The
Defense Security Cooperation AGency notified Congress of a possible
Foreign Military Sale to Kuwait of AIM-120C-7 AMRAAM Missiles as well
as associated equipment and services. The total value, if all options
are exercised, could be as high as $178 million. . . . The proposed
sale will improve Kuwait's capability to meet current and future
threats of enemy air-to-air weapons. Kuwait will use the enhanced
capability as a deterrent to regional threats and to strengthen its
homeland defense. . . . The prime contractor will be Raytheon Missile
Systems Corporation, Tucson, Arizona." Tina Susman and Caesar Ahmed (Los Angeles Times) report
on yesterday's attack on civilians in Baghdad, "Bodyguards of the
minister of displacement and migration, who has been telling Iraqis it
is safe to come home after five years of war, were involved in a
rush-hour shooting Monday that police said killed a woman and injured
six other people. Circumstances surrounding the incident were unclear.
The ministry said traffic police fired toward the minister's convoy and
that the bodyguards only fired into the air. Police said the bodyguards
were trying to clear traffic by shooting into the air and that one of
them accidentally aimed his gun into nearby cars. Witnesses said the
shooting was the result of a dispute between the ministry bodyguards
and traffic police." Nicholas Spangler and Hussein Kadhim (McClatchy Newspapers) quote
an eye witness (unnamed police officer) who states, "I saw guards
carrying maching guns shooting randomly. First, they killed a woman
who was trying to cross the intersection. After that they opened fire
on the traffic policeman who was doing his job. They shot him twice
and he was injured. He fell down on the street. Then they left the
cards and were walking with machine guns and pistols in their hands." Turning to some of today's reported violence . . . Bombings? Sahar Issa (McClatchy Newspapers) reports
the latest assasination attempt on an official via a Baghdad bombing
targeting Gen Hasen Maeen ("Prime Minister's office") that wounded him
"and two of his security personnel" while journalist Jawad al-Hattab
("bureau chief of al-Arabiyah") was targeted with a car bombing as well
but discovered it before it detonated and was unharmed, a Baghdad
roadside bombing claimed 1 life and left six people wounded and a
Salahuddin Province bombing claimed the life of 1 police officer and
left three more wounded. Shootings? Reuters notes
1 person shot dead and another wounded outside of Mussayab, 1 "local
aid agency" official shot dead in Mosul, 1 police officer shot dead in
Mosul, 1 person shot dead in Kut and 1 person shot dead outside Suwayra. Corpses? Turning
to the US presidential race. Independent presidential candidate Ralph
Nader can announce that the plan for the Nader-Gonzalez ticket to be on
the ballot in 45 states by September 20th happened nine days early.
Ralph and his running mate Matt Gonzalez (and their team of supporters)
have already advanced the independent run further than in 2004 and have
had to jump through obstacles of ballot access that no one should have
to. Choosing
between the Republican and Democratic candidate would mean choosing
the lesser of two evils. Instead, I prefer to align myself with a
candidate who shares my views on stabilizing the economy, preventing
war, and downsizing the government. This candidate is Ralph Nader. Nader
is the only presidential candidate who has experience running his own
business. He has applicable knowledge of the economy and strives to
distribute wealth equally. He was quoted on "Meet The Press" as saying:
"There is a two-tier economy where the top 10 percent is doing quite
well, the top one percent spectacularly. But the top one percent of the
richest people in this country have financial wealth equal to the
combined 95 percent of the American people. That's a very unhealthy
inequality." In order to fix this, Nader proposes to repeal the Bush
administration tax cuts and adjust the federal income tax. This shows
that he is driven to help the average American survive the current
economic slump. Nader also wants to help
America move past Congress's war-happy regime. He proposes a "draft
from the top," meaning when an administration approves a war, the
service-aged children of all members of that Congress and Cabinet will
be the first to serve. This would ensure that elected officials think
carefully before declaring war. Nader also supports pulling out of Iraq
within six months and trying to negotiate with Iran. He wants to take
our men and women in uniform out of Iraq and bring them home where they
belong. Why? We're celebrating. At the beginning of this campaign, we made a promise: Nader/Gonzalez on the ballot in 45 states by September 20. Today -- Tuesday, September 9, 2008 -- eleven days ahead of schedule -- we declare victory. We have completed our ballot access efforts and we're set to be on in 45 states. On in more states than in 2000 (43). On in more states than in 2004 (34). On in 45 states. Now, the American people will have a choice. To vote for a campaign free from corporate influence. But, as you probably have figured out by now, we are not a campaign that rests on its laurels. So, today we are proud to announce the launch of our eight-week Nader/Gonzalez Get Out the Vote drive. We need to raise $80,000 by September 17. This money will be used to reach out to Americans throughout this country. We're planning on deploying 30 full-time field staff. Ordering tens of thousands of lawn signs. Printing hundreds of thousands of pamphlets. And making hundreds of thousands of phone calls. To inform the American people that they now have a choice in November. And to get them to vote for Nader/Gonzalez. Want health care for all? Vote Nader/Gonzalez. Need a living wage? Vote Nader/Gonzalez. Want to transform the country to a solar energy economy? Vote Nader/Gonzalez. Want to reverse course in the Middle East? Vote Nader/Gonzalez. Help us celebrate this historic opportunity the only way we know how. With action for a change. So, donate $11 now to the Nader/Gonzalez Get Out the Vote Fund. (If you give $100 or more now,
we will send to you In Pursuit of Justice, the 520-page book of essays
by Ralph Nader -- essays on corporate power, the Constitution, and
transforming our country. If you donate $100 now, we will send you this
historic collection -- autographed by the man himself -- Ralph Nader.
(This offer ends at 11:59 p.m. September 17, 2008)) So, let's start to spread the word. Nader/Gonzalez on in 45 states. Time to crank it up. And get out the vote. Let's get it done. Onward to November. |
Posted at 10:38 am by cedricsbigmix
Permalink
Sep 9, 2008
POOR SENATOR "SWEETIE." ALREADY ON THE RUN FROM THE SARAH PALAN JUGGERNAUT ( PICTURED BELOW ON SUNDAY), BARACK CONTINUES TO SWEAT HIS OVERREACH.
THE BEST THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE CAN OFFER IS TO SEND IN THE WOMAN HE STOLE THE NOMINATION FROM TO TRY TO ADD ENTHUSIASM TO HIS INCREASINGLY FADED CAMPAIGN. ALL SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON ON THE ROAD DOES IS REMIND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY BASE THAT THE 'LEADERSHIP' SCREWED THEM OUT OF THE REAL CANDIDATE.
Turning to the US presidential race and starting with the pig holler Barack Obama. Shailah Murray (Washington Post) noted his comment last week on GOP vice presidential nominee Gov Sarah Palin "I assume she wants to be treated the same way that guys want to be treated" -- do you assume that? How very 'forward' of you, pig face. What an insulting thing for him to even say. Palin's run a real campaign. She didn't sniff her opponents panties to put them out of the race -- a claim Barack can't make for himself (see Jack Ryan especially). Barack went on to declare that he'd been vetted for 19 months unlike Sarah. Brack Obama vetted? Oh, that's hilarious. The only thing funnier than his claim to have been vetted is watching him nosedive in poll after poll. CNN offers the most optimistic findings from their poll with Opinion Research Corp: 3% undecided, 48% for Barack - [Joe] Biden, 48% for [John] McCain.- Palin. CBS News reports, " Sarah Palin's addition to the ticket probably exceeded her running mate's wildest expectations: McCain has turned an eight-point deficit in the Gallup daily tracking poll into a three-point lead." Dan Balz and Jon Cohen (Washington Post) report the results of the Washington Post-ABC News poll which find the two in a dead heat. Todd Spangler (Detroit Free Press) zooms in on Michigan and studies Public Policy Polling to determine, "From the data, it appears that the Palin pick is clearly helping McCain in the race against Obama in Michigan -- a state the Republican hopes to pick up in order to beat the Democrat." Michigan is, of course, the state Barack refused to have his name listed on the primary ballot and somehow managed -- via the 'rules' committee -- to come out with more delegates than Hillary from the primary she won -- the one he refused to compete in. Scott Conroy (CBS News) repeats the usual dumb ass garbage that concludes with, "Sarah Palin, by contrast, has repeatedly pointed to her son Track's service in the National Guard when making the case that John McCain should be the next president. Track Palin is scheduled to deploy to the Middle East later this week to begin his training for a tour of duty in Iraq." Let's speak slowly for the dumb asses. 1) Joe Biden's children's military service is stated and stretched. 2) Military service is not a private issue. For one thing, you're required to take a public oath. Scott Conroy sounds as idiotic as Jeannie Cummings and that's his own damn fault. And it's that dumb ass 'reasoning' that's going to have a sizeable number of people dismissing any 'scoops' (real or false) the media may come up with on Palin because it still sounds like they're gunning for her. Military service is public service. It is not about anyone's private life and -- unless you get a parental waiver -- only adults can enlist in the US. There's a big difference and Conroy looks like a real ass pretending there's not.
PBS' Independent Lens wrote of the now independent presidential candidate, "Ralph Nader was born on February 27, 1934 in Winsted, Connecticut. His parents, Nathra and Rose, were Lebanese immigrants. He received a B.A. from Princeton University in 1955 and graduated from Harvard Law School three years later. In 1963, he abandoned his Hartford, Connecticut law practice and hitchhiked to Washington, D.C. to embark on a lifelong career as a public citizen. He worked as a consultant to the U.S. Department of Labor and founded the Public Citizen research group." That was to promote their airing of the documentary An Unreasonable Man. And they also offered " Where's Nader?" as part of the promotion -- a photograph you could scroll across "to spot 18 things that can be attributed to his work."
At the Super Rally last week, he noted "three polls that will tell you that the Nader - Gonzalez agenda is a majority agenda. Inferentially and item by item. 81% of the American people think the country's going in the wrong direction. That's the highest level ever registered. 75% of the people in this country think corporations have too much control over their lives. And 61% of the people in this country in a Gallup poll say that the two major parties are failing." In response to a question regarding impeaching Dick Cheney and the Bully Boy after they leave office, Ralph explained ( here for video):
Ralph Nader: Well you can't impeach them once they leave office but they're subject on January 21, 2009 for criminal prosecution under federal law and it's possible. One of the most experienced prosecutors in the country, whose now retired, Vincent Bugliosi wrote that bestseller recently on the prosecution of George W. Bush [The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder]. Any district attorney, he claims, where a US soldier resideded and lost his or her life in Iraq due to a criminal war based on false pretenses by Bush and Cheney could bring a criminal homicide action and impanel a grand jury to indict both Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld. And it's often misunderstood that presidents and vice presidents do not escape the criminal laws after they leave office. When Nixon was accused of obstructing justice in the Watergate burglary back in the 70s, there was a Watergate task force of government attorneys that was just about to ask for his indictment and prosecute Nixon before [Gerald] Ford pardoned him. So for a one-time obstruction alleged in the Watergate burgalry, the arm of the criminal law was going to move forward. That is like tiny compared to the criminal behavior engendered day after day -- systemic torture, imprisoning thousands of people without charges and without lawyers, the signing statements, hundred of them, where George Bush would sign a bill and say "I will decide whether or not to obey it." Our Founding Fathers fought and got rid of King George III not to allow King George IV to take control of our country. And then of course there's spying in violation of the FISA Act without judicial warant on hundreds of thousands maybe millions of Americans. That's a first-class felony with a maximum penalty of a five-year jail term. And of course, there is the criminal war of aggression in Iraq -- probably the worst violation of international law other than genocide -- is a criminal war of aggression. So the question is: "Are there going to be any district attorneys in the country who are going to begin the process of holding presidents and vice presidents after they leave office accountable for their crimes or are Bush and Cheney going to set a precedent for their successors who then think that they can be above the law, beyond the law, violate the law with impunity?" That's the question that we all have to ask.
On Friday, Ralph spoke in Wisconsin and Kevin Bargnes (The Badger Herald) reports, "Nader and his running mate Matt Gonzalez support the establishment of a date for troop withdrawal from Iraq and an end to the imprisonment of nonviolent drug offenders.
A large portion of the attendees were University of Wisconsin students, and Nader painted a bleak future for a generation he believes will be worse off economically than its parents.
'You've got to wonder about whether you can get affordable housing, affordable health insurance, whether your white-collar skilled job dealing with software is going to be outsourced to China or India,' Nader said. 'And then in the moments of anxiety you're smoking a joint and you can be arrested and thrown in jail'." Michelle L. Quinn (Post-Tribune) reports on a sit-down interview with Nader and running mate Matt Gonzalez when they were in Indiana over the weekend, "Their platform includes items he says Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain have taken 'off the table,' such as a 6-month, comprehensive negotiated military and corporate withdrawal from Iraq; single-payer, Canadian style free-choice health insurance; a living-wage and repeal of the anti-union Taft-Hartley Act; and a no-nuke, solar-based energy policy supported by renewable and sustainable energy sources. Solar energy is a change he's touted for years, and many utility executives to whom he's spoken prefer wind power as the next energy source, he said." Ralph was also campaigning in Wisconsin over the weekend and among the speakers at Fighting Bob Fest. Matthew Ryno (Baraboo News Republic) reports he "gave a biting speech to kick off the morning's events. He targeted what he called, 'least, worst' voters, or voters who he says cannot tolerate another four years of a Republican as president. ' The question is whether or not we get a Republican in disguise,' Nader said, referring to Democrat Barack Obama. 'We're seeing similar parties.' Nader said. 'Measure the Democratic control of Congress and ask how much of Bush's legislature have they rolled back? Have they even tried to impeach?'"
Have they done anything? And what of Barack? Chris Floyd (Baltimore Chronicle) tackled the issue of 'anti-war' Barack over the weekend, "In short, he continued his relentless campaign to purge himself of any of that weak-sister 'anti-war' taint that got attached to him in the early days of his campaign -- which was, of course, responsible for his phenomenal rise in the first place. He rode that wave to national prominence -- trading on the desperate hopes of millions of Americans that the ungodly criminal nightmare in Iraq might finally end -- but it was obvious long ago that he was never going to dance with the ones that brung him. Once it was clear that he might really make it all the way to the top of the greasy pole, he began a dogged campaign to prove to our ruling elite that he would be a 'safe pair of hands' for the imperial enterprise."
| |
Posted at 04:08 pm by cedricsbigmix
Permalink
"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills)
|
September 8, 2008. Chaos and violence continue, cholera's back, the Iraqi Parliament is going to back into session, and more.
Cholera is back in the Iraq news. Sunday Reuters reported that cholera has claimed 1 life and that six more Iraqis have been diagnosed with it ("More than 4,000 cases of cholera . . . were diagnosed in Iraq last year.") Babylon & Beyond (Los Angeles Times) notes of cholera: "The problem raises the question: How can a country with two major rivers -- the Tigris and the Euphrates -- not have sufficient clean water for its people? The problem stems from Iraq's aging water treatment facilities, which were damaged or destroyed during the war and have yet to be replaced or repaired." Mike Sergeant (BBC) reports that the cholera outbreak had claimed 6 lives earlier today (the total continued to rise) and that "Cholera is mainly transmitted through contaminated water and untreated sewage. It can spread quickly in hot weather." And it spread quickly last year. There's no reason for the puppet government in Baghdad to pretend what's happened is shocking or surprising. After last year, it was to be expected. The World Health Organization noted October 3, 2007: "Since the cholera outbreak was first detected in Kirkuk, Northern Iraq, on 14 August 2007, it has spread to 9 out of 18 provinces across Iraq. It is estimated that more than 30 000 people have fallen ill with acute watery diarrhoea, among which 3 315 were identified as positive for Vibrio cholerae, the bacterium causing the disease. A total of 14 people are known to have died of the disease. The case-fatality rate has remained low throughout the outbreak indicating that those who have become sick have been able to access adequate treatment on time." Reuters reports that Babil province is now under a state of emergy due to the outbreak and that 8 people have died "in the past three days in Babil" with at least twenty diagnosed as infected. Gulf News adds that 500 more people are suspected of already being infected. IRIN spoke with Ihssan Jaafar (speaking on behalf of the puppet government) yesterday and he stated, "The health ministry is trying to stop the disease from spreading by early diagnosis of infection and distribution of water sterilisation tablets and also through a pbulic awareness campaign, but with the dearth of safe drinking water the disease will stay around." Again it was completely predictable.
Sunday in Baghdad a press conference took place on the state of health care in Iraq. Iraqis participating were Dr. Essan Namiq (Deputy Minister of Health for Grants and Loans) and Dr. Kahmees al-Sa'ad (Administrative Deputy Minister of Health). For some reason, a medical press conference required the participation of two American generals.
We learned that, unlike the United States, Iraq has some form of universal health care (Dr. Essame: "Frankly, Ministry of Health has a heavy weight on the budget of the state for offering free treatment inside Iraq, for sending the patients outside Iraq. Very heavy budget that's affecting the budget of the state. There is no neighboring countries, or all over the world any country . . . there is not country like us that offers free treatment." ). Diyala Province has a shortage of medications (Dr. Essam: ". . . yeah, maybe we are facing a shortage") and there is a serious issue with the limited medications in Baghdad being smuggled out of the medical environments onto the black market (Dr. Essam stated that "we expect to see such problems" and "hope" that a plan to address the problem will emerge at some point by "the end of 2008 to 2009").
In addition there have been problems with "spoiled blood" -- which Maj Gen Mohammed al-Askari (press spokesperson for the Ministry of Defense) intentionally avoided in his response. This was pinned on the people coming into Iraq. Though Iraq's borders are porous, Dr. Essam put forward the laughable claim that anyone crossing the border into Iraq is "going to be tested. This is especially in HIV. The . . . once the passport has been stamped, the person is being tested." Not only did al-Askari avoid that specific issue, he grabbed that question that was tossed to Dr. Essam.
July ended and the press gave rah-rah coverage in their end of the month reports when the reality is that the medical conditions in Iraq are a nightmare. For example, Dr. Essam admitted that they did not have the necessary prosthetics for patients who have limbs amputated. Shortages of medication, shortages of prosthetics, shortage of beds and, yes, shortage of medical staff. Dr. Essam floated the laughable claim that "many" Iraqi doctors were about to return to the country -- any day now! -- and when pressed on it, put foward the dubious claim that "more than 80% of the Iraqi doctors, and even in the deterioration of the security situation, they were here in Iraq and working. It is a fact." No, it is not. They were among the first to flee, long before there was a refugee crisis. It was part of the 'brain drain' that first hit Iraq. The number fleeing only increased when they became kidnapping targets and were also targeted with violence. Any doctors that do return will neither be housed in the Green Zone, according to Dr. Essam, nor provided with government protection because, he explained, 2008 is not like 2007.
It was revealed that nurses were selling medications and Dr. Essam wanted to remind everyone that "it is not within their job description." Asked about the huge increase in cancer rates in Basra and Najaf since the start of the illegal war, Dr. Essam claimed that was true "all over the world, the number of people afflicted with cancer is increasing." The issue of improving the hosptials (beyond exterior work) was raised (and it was noted that Shahad Adnan Hospital has over 13 floors and only two elevators as well as a bed shortage). Dr. Essam responded that, "It is good for their psychological health . . . it is good to take care of the appearance, to see the building a new, clean." Though that's of no comfort to someone climbing over 13 floors of stairs or doing without a hospital bed, Dr. Essan wanted the reporters to know, "We ourselves face problems with elevators." CBS and AP offer an embarrassing (mis)report but they may be the only outlet that covered the press conference. To read their (mis)report is to grasp that the talking point about "doctors returning!" can be teased into several paragraphs with nothing to back it up and that all the very real and serious problems (brought up by reporters at the press conference) can easily be ignored.
80%? Today Karin Laub (AP) notes that an estimated 8,000 Iraqi doctors have fled their country since the start of the illegal war and that 800 have returned. Both figures are flawed. It is over 8,000 and the exit of doctors (male and female) was not just part of the 'brain drain' it was also the result of doctors (especially females) being targeted. 800 is the puppet government's latest figure and is not independently verified. They say whatever they want and no one bothers to verify it. It's also not true that "Doctors are just a tiny group among Iraq's more than 4 million refugees and displaced" because the doctors (and others) who left during the 'brain drain' are not considered refugees, they had the money to start over and left earlier in the illegal war before the sect divisions became as fixed. Though the figures Laub uses are incorrect, they are supplied by the puppet government and, no, 700 is not 80% of 8,000.
The largely ignored August press conference also saw a reporter raise the issue of counterfeit medicine and today Qatar's Peninsula reports that 90% of medicines in Iraq are imported and there are no tests of it leading the Ministry of Health's Inspector General Adel Muhsin to state, "It's not medicine. It's just boxes, and God knows what's in them."
On the legislative front, Qassim Abdul-Zahra (AP) reports that the Iraqi Parliament resumes sessions this week and that they hope to address both the issue of provincial elections and the treaties with the US but that provincial elections have been discussed while the the Parliament was on break and trial ballons floated were not embraced ("But weeks of private meetings and contacts among Sunni Arab, Shiite and Kurdish lawmakers have failed to produce any breakthrough on the issue, and it was unclear whether the bill would win speedy approval."). Sunday Erica Goode (New York Times) reported that the UN's special envoy to Iraq, Staffan de Mistura, had met with Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani and that he "said later that in the meeting the two men discussed the problems that have blocked passage of a provincial election law by Iraq's Parliament." When the Parliament's regular session proved unable to pass a law for provinical elections, the United Nations announced they would study the issue, speak with various Iraqis and try to offer a proposal by the end of September of early October. Yet, as noted in the September 4th snapshot, Iraqi's Shi'ite vice president Adel Abdul-Mahdi has declared that provincial elections will take place regardless of whether a law is passed or not.
Tomorrow the Bully Boy is expected to announce the latest US troops 'plan' for Iraq. Ann Scott Tyson and Karen DeYoung (Washington Post) reported Saturday, "Senior military officials said the 'consensus' proposal incorporated the final recommendation of Petraeus. He called for withdrawing 7,500 to 8,000 troops from Iraq by the end of January, including an 1,100-man Marine Corps battalion and a Marine aviation squadron of several hundred strong to depart this fall, an Army combat brigade of up to 4,000 soldiers to depart in mid-January, and more than 1,000 support troops, such as logisticians and forces, assigned to handle detainees."
Turning to some of today's reported violence . . .
Bombings?
Laith Hammoudi (McClatchy Newspapers) reports a Baghdad roadside bombing that left eleven people wounded, a Baghdad bombing that claimed 1 life and left two wounded, another Baghdad bombing that wounded two people, a Baghdad grenade attack that wounded two people, a Nineveh car bombing claimed the life of 1 police officer and left four people wounded, a Salahuddin Province car bombing that claimed the lives of 2 civilians with four more wounded and a Basra roadside bombing left one person wounded and a home invasion of "Awakening" Council leader Raad Rasheed in Diyala Province in which Rasheed was kidnapped and, in the chase that followed, three Iraqi military members were wounded by a roadside bombing.
Shootings?
Laith Hammoudi (McClatchy Newspapers) reports a Baghdad attack on "a vehicle for the ministry of displace people" which left four employees wounded while (elswhere in Baghdad), the same ministry's guards "opened fire randomly" shooting 1 woman dead and leaving six more people wounded, 1 police officer was shot dead in Mosul and the US military shot dead 1 person whose 'crime' was driving his car in Baquba.
Corpses?
Turning to the US presidential race and starting with the pig holler Barack Obama. Shailah Murray (Washington Post) noted his comment last week on GOP vice presidential nominee Gov Sarah Palin "I assume she wants to be treated the same way that guys want to be treated" -- do you assume that? How very 'forward' of you, pig face. What an insulting thing for him to even say. Palin's run a real campaign. She didn't sniff her opponents panties to put them out of the race -- a claim Barack can't make for himself (see Jack Ryan especially). Barack went on to declare that he'd been vetted for 19 months unlike Sarah. Brack Obama vetted? Oh, that's hilarious. The only thing funnier than his claim to have been vetted is watching him nosedive in poll after poll. CNN offers the most optimistic findings from their poll with Opinion Research Corp: 3% undecided, 48% for Barack - [Joe] Biden, 48% for [John] McCain.- Palin. CBS News reports, " Sarah Palin's addition to the ticket probably exceeded her running mate's wildest expectations: McCain has turned an eight-point deficit in the Gallup daily tracking poll into a three-point lead." Dan Balz and Jon Cohen (Washington Post) report the results of the Washington Post-ABC News poll which find the two in a dead heat. Todd Spangler (Detroit Free Press) zooms in on Michigan and studies Public Policy Polling to determine, "From the data, it appears that the Palin pick is clearly helping McCain in the race against Obama in Michigan -- a state the Republican hopes to pick up in order to beat the Democrat." Michigan is, of course, the state Barack refused to have his name listed on the primary ballot and somehow managed -- via the 'rules' committee -- to come out with more delegates than Hillary from the primary she won -- the one he refused to compete in. Scott Conroy (CBS News) repeats the usual dumb ass garbage that concludes with, "Sarah Palin, by contrast, has repeatedly pointed to her son Track's service in the National Guard when making the case that John McCain should be the next president. Track Palin is scheduled to deploy to the Middle East later this week to begin his training for a tour of duty in Iraq." Let's speak slowly for the dumb asses. 1) Joe Biden's children's military service is stated and stretched. 2) Military service is not a private issue. For one thing, you're required to take a public oath. Scott Conroy sounds as idiotic as Jeannie Cummings and that's his own damn fault. And it's that dumb ass 'reasoning' that's going to have a sizeable number of people dismissing any 'scoops' (real or false) the media may come up with on Palin because it still sounds like they're gunning for her. Military service is public service. It is not about anyone's private life and -- unless you get a parental waiver -- only adults can enlist in the US. There's a big difference and Conroy looks like a real ass pretending there's not.
PBS' Independent Lens wrote of the now independent presidential candidate, "Ralph Nader was born on February 27, 1934 in Winsted, Connecticut. His parents, Nathra and Rose, were Lebanese immigrants. He received a B.A. from Princeton University in 1955 and graduated from Harvard Law School three years later. In 1963, he abandoned his Hartford, Connecticut law practice and hitchhiked to Washington, D.C. to embark on a lifelong career as a public citizen. He worked as a consultant to the U.S. Department of Labor and founded the Public Citizen research group." That was to promote their airing of the documentary An Unreasonable Man. And they also offered " Where's Nader?" as part of the promotion -- a photograph you could scroll across "to spot 18 things that can be attributed to his work."
At the Super Rally last week, he noted "three polls that will tell you that the Nader - Gonzalez agenda is a majority agenda. Inferentially and item by item. 81% of the American people think the country's going in the wrong direction. That's the highest level ever registered. 75% of the people in this country think corporations have too much control over their lives. And 61% of the people in this country in a Gallup poll say that the two major parties are failing." In response to a question regarding impeaching Dick Cheney and the Bully Boy after they leave office, Ralph explained ( here for video):
Ralph Nader: Well you can't impeach them once they leave office but they're subject on January 21, 2009 for criminal prosecution under federal law and it's possible. One of the most experienced prosecutors in the country, whose now retired, Vincent Bugliosi wrote that bestseller recently on the prosecution of George W. Bush [The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder]. Any district attorney, he claims, where a US soldier resideded and lost his or her life in Iraq due to a criminal war based on false pretenses by Bush and Cheney could bring a criminal homicide action and impanel a grand jury to indict both Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld. And it's often misunderstood that presidents and vice presidents do not escape the criminal laws after they leave office. When Nixon was accused of obstructing justice in the Watergate burglary back in the 70s, there was a Watergate task force of government attorneys that was just about to ask for his indictment and prosecute Nixon before [Gerald] Ford pardoned him. So for a one-time obstruction alleged in the Watergate burgalry, the arm of the criminal law was going to move forward. That is like tiny compared to the criminal behavior engendered day after day -- systemic torture, imprisoning thousands of people without charges and without lawyers, the signing statements, hundred of them, where George Bush would sign a bill and say "I will decide whether or not to obey it." Our Founding Fathers fought and got rid of King George III not to allow King George IV to take control of our country. And then of course there's spying in violation of the FISA Act without judicial warant on hundreds of thousands maybe millions of Americans. That's a first-class felony with a maximum penalty of a five-year jail term. And of course, there is the criminal war of aggression in Iraq -- probably the worst violation of international law other than genocide -- is a criminal war of aggression. So the question is: "Are there going to be any district attorneys in the country who are going to begin the process of holding presidents and vice presidents after they leave office accountable for their crimes or are Bush and Cheney going to set a precedent for their successors who then think that they can be above the law, beyond the law, violate the law with impunity?" That's the question that we all have to ask.
On Friday, Ralph spoke in Wisconsin and Kevin Bargnes (The Badger Herald) reports, "Nader and his running mate Matt Gonzalez support the establishment of a date for troop withdrawal from Iraq and an end to the imprisonment of nonviolent drug offenders.
A large portion of the attendees were University of Wisconsin students, and Nader painted a bleak future for a generation he believes will be worse off economically than its parents.
'You've got to wonder about whether you can get affordable housing, affordable health insurance, whether your white-collar skilled job dealing with software is going to be outsourced to China or India,' Nader said. 'And then in the moments of anxiety you're smoking a joint and you can be arrested and thrown in jail'." Michelle L. Quinn (Post-Tribune) reports on a sit-down interview with Nader and running mate Matt Gonzalez when they were in Indiana over the weekend, "Their platform includes items he says Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain have taken 'off the table,' such as a 6-month, comprehensive negotiated military and corporate withdrawal from Iraq; single-payer, Canadian style free-choice health insurance; a living-wage and repeal of the anti-union Taft-Hartley Act; and a no-nuke, solar-based energy policy supported by renewable and sustainable energy sources. Solar energy is a change he's touted for years, and many utility executives to whom he's spoken prefer wind power as the next energy source, he said." Ralph was also campaigning in Wisconsin over the weekend and among the speakers at Fighting Bob Fest. Matthew Ryno (Baraboo News Republic) reports he "gave a biting speech to kick off the morning's events. He targeted what he called, 'least, worst' voters, or voters who he says cannot tolerate another four years of a Republican as president. ' The question is whether or not we get a Republican in disguise,' Nader said, referring to Democrat Barack Obama. 'We're seeing similar parties.' Nader said. 'Measure the Democratic control of Congress and ask how much of Bush's legislature have they rolled back? Have they even tried to impeach?'"
Have they done anything? And what of Barack? Chris Floyd (Baltimore Chronicle) tackled the issue of 'anti-war' Barack over the weekend, "In short, he continued his relentless campaign to purge himself of any of that weak-sister 'anti-war' taint that got attached to him in the early days of his campaign -- which was, of course, responsible for his phenomenal rise in the first place. He rode that wave to national prominence -- trading on the desperate hopes of millions of Americans that the ungodly criminal nightmare in Iraq might finally end -- but it was obvious long ago that he was never going to dance with the ones that brung him. Once it was clear that he might really make it all the way to the top of the greasy pole, he began a dogged campaign to prove to our ruling elite that he would be a 'safe pair of hands' for the imperial enterprise."
|
Posted at 03:44 pm by cedricsbigmix
Permalink
Sep 7, 2008
BARACK OBAMA CALLED THESE REPORTERS SOBBING ON THE PHONE THIS EVENING.
"BUT I ALWAYS PLAY THE VICTIM!" SWEETIE BARACK SOBBED. "MY PEOPLE INVENT FANTASIES ABOUT PLOTS TO KILL ME, MY SURROGATES INVENT VERBAL ATTACKS ON ME AND IT ALWAYS DRIVES UP SUPPORT FOR ME. IF I CAN'T PLAY THE VICTIM, HOW CAN I RUN FOR PUBLIC OFFICE? IT'S NOT FAIR!"
Turning to the US presidential race. Yesterday's financial goal for the Ralph Nader campaign was to reach $100,000 in the donations for the Nader Media Fund which led to some mocking in the press. Not only did they reach $100,000, the campaign surpassed it, hitting $104,500 via donaors from around the country -- Texas, Wisconsin, Arizona, California, Oregon, Illinois, Colorado, Hawaii and elsewhere. Meanwhile Richard Winger's Ballot Access News reports Ralph Nader is currently on the ballot in 38 states (the Green Party in 31, the Constitution Party in 33 and the Libertarian Party in 42 -- see chart at the top of the page). Hamza Shaban (The Cavalier Daily) observes, "What Democrats have failed to realize is this: Nader is most dangerous when he is ignored. As a politician on the fringe, he does not seek the broadest coalition but makes new ones. If his platform is not integrated into the Democratic party's, then he will relentlessly go after the disaffected and carve out his own demographic. What loyal Democrats call "spoiling," Nader calls a systemic and deliberate boycott." Team Nader notes:
WATCH THE VIDEO
The revolution will not be televised - but thanks to your help, it will be on youtube.
We passed our media fund goal of $100,000 and brought in over $20,000 yesterday alone!
This video is our highlight reel from the "Open the Debates" super rally in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The rally took place on September 4, at the same time as the Republican National Convention in neighboring St. Paul. I flew to Minnesota to shoot video of this exciting event, then stayed up all night editing - I hope you enjoy the result. Also, because of your generous support, you will see much more coverage of future events.
Onward
Adam Kokesh: Thanks to a few neocon, chicken-hawk draft dodgers I was sent to Falluja in 2004 with the Marine Corps Civil Affairs Team and I found out the hard way that the greatest enemies of the Constitution of the United States of America are not to be found in the sands of some far off land but rather right here at home. It's not enough to understand that the war in Iraq is simply unjust, illegal, unconstitutional, costing us a horrendous amount of money and destroying our military. The issues before us today are a matter of life and death. I continue to serve my country today as a member of Iraq Veterans Against the War, Veterans for Peace and the Campaign for Liberty. It is through the Campaign for Liberty that we will take Ron Paul's message, we will take the torch of freedom that he has borne so well for us, we will take it back to our communities and set brushfires of freedom in the mind of every liberty loving man, woman and child in this great country. I'd like to take a second to recognize the veterans in the room -- if you would please stand -- and any active duty service members please stand. These are the brave men and women who swore an oath with their lives to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. And while it is our responsibility now to resist tyranny civily while we still can, there may come a time when we will say to the powers that be "With your blood or ours, we have come to water the tree of liberty." And it is those veterans and myself, we will be on the frontlines. Who will stand with us? Thank you for taking that stand. To all of you loyal soldiers in this new revolutionary army, it is an honor to count myself among your ranks and I salute you. You want a revolution? You better be ready to fight for it. Now I want you all to get back on your feet, take that stance for liberty with me, with all the veterans in this room, make for yourself the same committment with your lives, your fortunes and your sacred honor to our cause and make that pledge from your hearts where the fire of liberty burns that we will not rest 'till we achieve our goals and we get this new revolution in America. Now I want you to stay on your feet for just for just another minute -- you're going to want to stay on your feet for this -- because now I have the great pleaure of introducing on behalf of the Campaign for Liberty, someone you have all been waiting to see, Aimee Allen.
Note, Adam is co-chair of IVAW. He was speaking for himself at the Ron Paul rally as do all IVAW members participating in political campaigns for candidates. IVAW does not endorse any single candidate, they do not belong to or serve one party. IVAW is a diverse group in all ways including politically. Their shared beliefs include an end to the illegal war, reperations for the Iraqi people and that US veterans' service is honored (and promises ke | | | | | |